Sidebar

  • Science
    • Projects
      • GLACIATION
      • NEPHELE
      • SMARTEDGE
      • CIRPASS
      • GATEKEEPER
      • SDN-microSENSE
      • TERMINET
      • TRAPEZE
      • WAI-COOP
      • WAI-GUIDE
      • HRADIO
      • MOSAICrOWN
      • SPECIAL
      • WAI-TOOLS
      • BOOST 4.0
      • Create-IoT
      • Data Market Services
      • Easy Reading
      • 3GWeb
      • ABCDE
      • ACGT
      • AMIDA
      • ANFAS
      • AXES
      • Beyond the Horizon
      • BigDataEurope
      • BlueBridge
      • COMPOSE
      • CoreGRID
      • CROSSOVER
      • CRUCID
      • CYCLADES
      • C-WEB
      • D4Science
      • D4ScienceII
      • DECAIR
      • D-CENT
      • DigitalWorld
      • DELOS
      • DELOS2
      • DILIGENT
      • DISCIPL
      • eAccess+
      • EchoGRID
      • ENGAGE
      • ESIMEAU
      • Euro-India Spirit
      • EU-NSF
      • Euro-India
      • fet11
      • Geo-Recap
      • Global ITV
      • Grid@Asia
      • GridCOMP
      • HTML5APPS
      • iMarine
      • INTERLINK
      • LIDER
      • MediaScape
      • MobiWeb2.0
      • MobiWebApp
      • MODTRAIN
      • MtoM3D
      • Multilingual Web
      • MUSCLE
      • Net-WMS
      • OMWeb
      • PALETTE
      • PaaSaage
      • PRIME
      • PrimeLife
      • PrivacyOS
      • Race Network RFID
      • RESET
      • SCHOLNET
      • SERENOA
      • Share PSI 2.0
      • SIMES
      • SmartOpenData
      • STREWS
      • TELEMAC
      • THETIS
      • VITALAS
      • VOICES
      • VPH
      • VRE4EIC
      • WADI
      • WAI-ACT
      • WAI-AGE
      • WAI-DEV
      • WEBINOS
      • EU-LA
      • AIOLIA
    • Working Groups
      • EOSC and GAIA-X
    • Cooperations and Partnerships
    • EOSC and GAIA-X
    • Beyond Compliance - Digital Ethics in Research
  • Home
  • Empowering People
    • Fellowship Programme
    • Programme for PhD Education
    • Cor Baayen Early Career Researcher Award
    • In-House Staff Exchange Programmes
    • Jobs
  • Beyond Compliance
    • Beyond Compliance - Forum Program
    • Registration - Forum on Digital Ethics in Research
    • Beyond Compliance 2022
    • Beyond Compliance 2023 - Speakers
    • Beyond Compliance 2023
    • Beyond Compliance 2024 - Speakers
    • Beyond Compliance 2024
    • Beyond Compliance 2025 - Speakers
  • Publications
    • ERCIM News
    • Strategic Reports
    • Leaflets and Brochures
    • Annual Report
  • About
    • Objectives
    • Membership
    • Member representation
    • ERCIM Office
    • Governance
    • ERCIM and W3C
    • Legal Info
    • Contact
    • Slides
    • Logos for Download
  • Latest news
  • Events
    • Upcoming ERCIM Events
    • First ERCIM-JST Joint Symposium
    • Workshop on Privacy, Transparency, Sovereignty and Security
      • Suggested hotels at Sophia
      • Venue at Sophia
    • Past ERCIM Events
    • ERCIM fall meetings 2018
    • 3rd Joint ERCIM-JST Workshop
    • FP HCTG event
    • TRAPEZE Webinar
    • ERCIM Days
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2023
      • ERCM spring meetings 2023
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2022
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2021
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2021
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2020
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2020
      • ERCIM 30th Anniversary and Fall Meetings
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2022
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2019
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2024
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2024
        • ERCIM fall meetings 2024 - registration
      • ERCIM 2025 spring meetings
        • ERCIM 2025 spring meetings registration form
    • 5th ERCIM/JST Joint Workshop 2024
      • ERCIM-JST workshop 2024 registration form
    • AIOTI Workshop on Semantic Interoperability for Digital Twins
    • Forum on Digital Ethics in Research
  • Intranet
    • BSCW
    • Wikis
    • Mailing Lists
    • Login
    • Shared Calendar
    • Absence
    • Webmail
ERCIM
  • Science
    • Projects
      • GLACIATION
      • NEPHELE
      • SMARTEDGE
      • CIRPASS
      • GATEKEEPER
      • SDN-microSENSE
      • TERMINET
      • TRAPEZE
      • WAI-COOP
      • WAI-GUIDE
      • HRADIO
      • MOSAICrOWN
      • SPECIAL
      • WAI-TOOLS
      • BOOST 4.0
      • Create-IoT
      • Data Market Services
      • Easy Reading
      • 3GWeb
      • ABCDE
      • ACGT
      • AMIDA
      • ANFAS
      • AXES
      • Beyond the Horizon
      • BigDataEurope
      • BlueBridge
      • COMPOSE
      • CoreGRID
      • CROSSOVER
      • CRUCID
      • CYCLADES
      • C-WEB
      • D4Science
      • D4ScienceII
      • DECAIR
      • D-CENT
      • DigitalWorld
      • DELOS
      • DELOS2
      • DILIGENT
      • DISCIPL
      • eAccess+
      • EchoGRID
      • ENGAGE
      • ESIMEAU
      • Euro-India Spirit
      • EU-NSF
      • Euro-India
      • fet11
      • Geo-Recap
      • Global ITV
      • Grid@Asia
      • GridCOMP
      • HTML5APPS
      • iMarine
      • INTERLINK
      • LIDER
      • MediaScape
      • MobiWeb2.0
      • MobiWebApp
      • MODTRAIN
      • MtoM3D
      • Multilingual Web
      • MUSCLE
      • Net-WMS
      • OMWeb
      • PALETTE
      • PaaSaage
      • PRIME
      • PrimeLife
      • PrivacyOS
      • Race Network RFID
      • RESET
      • SCHOLNET
      • SERENOA
      • Share PSI 2.0
      • SIMES
      • SmartOpenData
      • STREWS
      • TELEMAC
      • THETIS
      • VITALAS
      • VOICES
      • VPH
      • VRE4EIC
      • WADI
      • WAI-ACT
      • WAI-AGE
      • WAI-DEV
      • WEBINOS
      • EU-LA
      • AIOLIA
    • Working Groups
      • EOSC and GAIA-X
    • Cooperations and Partnerships
    • EOSC and GAIA-X
    • Beyond Compliance - Digital Ethics in Research
  • Home
  • Empowering People
    • Fellowship Programme
    • Programme for PhD Education
    • Cor Baayen Early Career Researcher Award
    • In-House Staff Exchange Programmes
    • Jobs
  • Beyond Compliance
    • Beyond Compliance - Forum Program
    • Registration - Forum on Digital Ethics in Research
    • Beyond Compliance 2022
    • Beyond Compliance 2023 - Speakers
    • Beyond Compliance 2023
    • Beyond Compliance 2024 - Speakers
    • Beyond Compliance 2024
    • Beyond Compliance 2025 - Speakers
  • Publications
    • ERCIM News
    • Strategic Reports
    • Leaflets and Brochures
    • Annual Report
  • About
    • Objectives
    • Membership
    • Member representation
    • ERCIM Office
    • Governance
    • ERCIM and W3C
    • Legal Info
    • Contact
    • Slides
    • Logos for Download
  • Latest news
  • Events
    • Upcoming ERCIM Events
    • First ERCIM-JST Joint Symposium
    • Workshop on Privacy, Transparency, Sovereignty and Security
      • Suggested hotels at Sophia
      • Venue at Sophia
    • Past ERCIM Events
    • ERCIM fall meetings 2018
    • 3rd Joint ERCIM-JST Workshop
    • FP HCTG event
    • TRAPEZE Webinar
    • ERCIM Days
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2023
      • ERCM spring meetings 2023
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2022
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2021
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2021
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2020
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2020
      • ERCIM 30th Anniversary and Fall Meetings
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2022
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2019
      • ERCIM spring meetings 2024
      • ERCIM fall meetings 2024
        • ERCIM fall meetings 2024 - registration
      • ERCIM 2025 spring meetings
        • ERCIM 2025 spring meetings registration form
    • 5th ERCIM/JST Joint Workshop 2024
      • ERCIM-JST workshop 2024 registration form
    • AIOTI Workshop on Semantic Interoperability for Digital Twins
    • Forum on Digital Ethics in Research
  1. Home
  2. Science
  3. Projects
  4. MainContent
  5. Activity
   

Activity

Please select an item from the menu.

EOSC and GAIA-X

Details
Last Updated: 13 June 2025

ERCIM has initiated efforts to track and coordinate information exchange among its members regarding their activities in key European initiatives EOSC and GAIA-X. This aims to foster awareness, identify synergies, and support informed collaboration within the ERCIM community.

 

Abstract

Details
Last Updated: 02 August 2023

Abstract 2022

The ERCIM Ethics Working Group is organizing a workshop/seminar on October 17/18th, 2022, targeted at researchers and Research Ethics Boards (REBs). The event will consist of keynotes, presentations, tutorials and interactive sessions, and will provide ample time for open discussions. Different outcomes are envisioned, including some which may be directed towards policy makers.

The responsible and ethical conduct of research in science and engineering is critical for excellence, socially relevant impact and public trust. The practice of ethical and regulatory review of research grew out of very harmful so-called medical research involving human subjects that came to light in the early 1970s, as the widespread adoption of ethical principles in the conduct of human studies were slow to develop up to that point despite the Nuremberg Code (1947). Institutional Review Boards and the Belmont Report (1979) then came out of the US, remaining today an essential reference along with the Declaration of Helsinki (1964) for Research Ethics Boards (REBs), the latter ensuring appropriate steps are taken to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects involved in research studies around the world. Regulations in the domain of biomedical research have been fairly effective in balancing the progress of research with the protection of research subjects, and have largely contributed to create a culture of ethical awareness around research involving human subjects.

Reflecting upon the ethical issues they faced, including some that existing oversight authorities may have been unaware of or that went beyond their usual purview, a group of computer science researchers described how the guidelines of the Belmont report can be usefully applied in fields related to research involving information and communication technology. The resulting Menlo Report (2012) adapted the three basic ethical principles established in the Belmont report - Respect for Persons/Autonomy, Beneficence, and Justice - to the context of computer security research, and added a fourth principle, Respect for Law and Public Interest. A key input of the Menlo Report is the need to perform a comprehensive stakeholder analysis to properly apply any of those principles in the complex setting of computer science and ICT research; while not the direct subjects of research, secondary stakeholders may also be harmed and may also have the right to autonomy and justice.

Digital and connected technologies have increasingly become intertwined with our individual and collective daily lives, mediating our communications, profiling our behaviours, changing how we think, live and act, and presenting new tensions that interrogate the applications of these guiding ethical principles. Research in digital sciences -- including computer science, automatic control, robotics and applied mathematics -- raises many new ethical challenges resulting from interactions between humans and deep tech. But in spite of previous efforts, researchers in these fields are often ill-equipped (and sometimes reluctant) to deal with potential ethical implications of their work and the current research framework is ill-suited to oversee the unique ethical risks emerging in association with such fields as data science and AI research. Typical questions in this context include:

About ethics in the era of big data and autonomous systems:

  • What are the biggest ethical challenges posed by new, data-intensive research areas? How to proceed when both benefit and risk are typically intangible?
  • How can one circumscribe such issues as bias and the prospect of societal harm that increasingly plague AI research? Is every line of research in digital sciences worth pursuing and every piece of digital tech worth building in view of potentially very harmful foreseen applications and use cases?
  • How can the ethical risks to participants and other stakeholders be predicted and controlled as digital technologies change at such a fast pace?
  • How to guarantee ethical considerations observance beyond ex-ante subject consent or REBs
  • approval in computer science research projects, where researcher-subject relationships tend to be disconnected and dispersed, often involve a proliferation of data sources, and there is an inherent overlap between research and operations?
  • How can crowdsourcing/micro tasking services, often an integral part of many data-intensive research programs, be used in a responsible and ethical way?
  • Who is responsible if the machine malfunctions: the designer (who may be a researcher), the owner of the data, the owner of the system, its user, or perhaps the system itself?
  • What is the researcher's responsibility for the behaviors and actions of a robot or autonomous system that he or she has contributed to design?

About best practices, training and awareness:

  • What are the best practices researchers in digital sciences can follow to avoid unintended consequences of their work?
  • How to raise awareness at an early stage of the career and incentivise researchers to be more ethically prepared? Do they need to be made accountable somehow?
  • Is open science really the ideal context for ethical and responsible research to flourish?
  • How can ethical considerations be incorporated at the earliest stages of a research project?
  • How to foster regular and open discussions on questions of ethics and responsibility in research communities, in particular data-driven research communities?
  • Is there such a thing as a reproducibility crisis in CS research?

About ethical review and regulation:

  • How can researchers and REBs work to promote public trust in research in digital sciences, as IRBs have in human subject research?
  • Should we reconsider what it means to be a REB in the digital age? How to adapt REB requirements to the specific context of research in digital sciences?
  • Do we have a clear standard of what is ethically permissible in research in digital sciences? Can deceptive techniques be used and to what extent?
  • Is the requirement introduced by major computer science research conferences that submissions have to include an Impact Statement (describing ethical aspects of the work and future societal consequences) and to undergo review by an internal Ethics Committee an adequate response?
  • How does it articulate with the work of REBs?
  • Will or should part of computer science research ethics eventually move from soft law oversight to binding regulations? What parallel can be drawn or lessons be learned from historical developments in the field of medical research?
  • Should REBs merely review the ethics of research in digital sciences itself or also consider the broader research enterprise and context within which that research is situated?
  • The General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), which gives a high level of protection to individuals’ rights and personal data, provides for a framework to enable derogations (to be introduced by EU or Member State law) from these rights when scientific research is concerned.
  • Are such derogations adequate and flexible enough to encompass the whole nature, process and demands of scientific research in digital sciences? Conversely, can a full implementation of these derogations render the research unethical and not in line with individuals’ interests?

About innovation and working with other fields:

  • In terms of research ethics, what are the specifics of working in an interdisciplinary setting, in particular in digital health research? Are best practices, processes and tools of the fields under consideration easy to conciliate?
  • Is doing research in digital sciences with industrial partners a long and bumpy road?
  • In a world where many researchers found private companies, how to regulate situations where such companies may be the conduit of (data-intensive) research outside the ethical review of the researchers' home institutions?
  • Should formal ethical review extend to research-led innovation? How will research -- that has to comply with increasingly complex ethical questions and procedures -- be affected if a clear distinction is made with innovation?
  • How to conciliate the standard practice of digital platform innovation using subjects who are given improved or enhanced free services with the failing of such practices to be considered a voluntary participation element of informed consent according to the Menlo Report?

If you are interested to participate or if you would like to receive more information, please contact the organisers at This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Home 

ERCIM Start-Up Support Program for the EU

Details
Last Updated: 12 September 2024

Photo by Campaign Creators on UnsplashStart-up companies in the areas of mathematics and computer science often are not bound to national borders. Especially in current times, where virtual meetings occur abundantly, this becomes even more emphasized: many start-up companies like to explore their possibilities abroad. When considering other countries, they often face several challenges. Such challenges usually concern getting to know local customers, actors, practices, or laws; or the need for local (low-budget) office space and funds.

Partners in ERCIM like to offer help for start-ups, especially those related to mathematics and informatics (ICT), to expand their businesses in other countries than their own. Several ERCIM partners thus like to cooperate with each other, in order to help out start-ups for this matter. The participating ERCIM institutes may differ in the kind of support they offer, and in whether they provide support themselves or refer start-ups to the appropriate help somewhere else.

Procedure

Below, we classify certain areas for help; this eases the search for help. In addition, we show in a table which ERCIM partner (country) can offer (which type of) support, and who is the contact person. In order to request help, a start-up may reach out to the local contact person in its own country, who will assess the possibilities for referring the start-up to the requested country. Further,

  • the local institute should check the requests by start-ups (only promising and serious requests are further referred), and
  • only the participating institute in the country of the start-up can connect to another, participating institute.

Types of support

A) Guidance & introduction to customers, actors, and events

Knowing the right people, companies, events, customers and other actors is of uttermost importance when a start-up company wants to reach out to some other country. Getting introduced to these can be most helpful. Examples of questions and requests that are relevant are:

  • What are good routes to customers?
  • What are the best trade fairs and similar events?
  • Introduction to potential customers, partners, or networks.
  • Getting an overview over the relevant business landscape and its relevant actors

B) Local practices

Local business practices vary from country to country, even within Europe. Getting help with the local (national) practices and possible additional help can be useful for start-ups. Examples of questions that are relevant are:

  • What do customers expect?
  • How is my offer best packaged?
  • What are the customs of dealing with (potential) partners?

C) Legal, accounting, and administration

Once a start-up is actually doing business abroad, the national laws, rules, and administrative matters in that country become important. Getting help on these matters or getting pointers to the right people that could help, could be essential for doing business. Examples of questions that are relevant are:

  • What are the local, national rules and regulations about doing business?
  • How to take care of administrative matters?
  • How to get access to legal and accounting services? Or what are recommended services?

D) Office space

Trying to expand to another country may require actual local activities and being present. Local office space can be essential. Examples of questions or requests that are relevant are:

  • Can I get shared office space? Or some other kind of desk-surfing? Especially at/by the institute affiliated to ERCIM?
  • Are there potential hosting option available? E.g. at science & technology parks?

E) Investors and funds

Acquiring appropriate funds can be important in order to expand in another country. Examples of questions that are relevant are:

  • How or where can I find the proper VC funds or investors?
  • Can I be introduced to VC funds or investors?

Participating ERCIM institutes

For the time being, the start-up support is organised between participating ERCIM institutes only. That is, a start-up can get support from a participating ERCIM partner in another country, if the ERCIM partner in its own country participates in this start-up program.

Current participants in this program are CWI (The Netherlands), FORTH-ICS (Greece), INESC (Portugal), Inria (France) and RISE (Sweden).

All services and support are subject to availability.
i = support by the ERCIM institute; r = referral to others for support

Country Institute Type of Support Contact person for start-ups Relevant units/initiatives
Greece FORTH-ICS C(r), D(i), E(r) This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • PRAXI Network (TTO), This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
  • Science & Technology Park of Crete (STEP-C), This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. 
France Inria B, C, E This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Start up studio intiative, This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
The Netherlands CWI A(i/r), B(i/r), C(i/r), D(r), E(r) This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it. Incubator CWI Inc., This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
Portugal INESC A, B, C, E This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  
Sweden RISE A, B, D This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.  

*All support based on availability and competency regarding the specific request. However, all requests will be reviewed, and we’re happy to answer to the best of our efforts, and connect to the right networks, competency, resources etc.

Objectives

Details
Last Updated: 18 June 2025

ERCIM

Connected Excellence in Research

ERCIM, the European Research Consortium for Informatics and Mathematics, fosters collaboration across Europe's research community and strengthens ties with industry. It brings together leading research institutes to advance innovation and cooperation in these fields.

ERCIM’s mission is to help ensure Europe plays a leading role in the field of Information and Communication Technologies. To achieve this, ERCIM brings together a network of centres of excellence in ICT across Europe, fostering collaboration and innovation across borders.

Through its participation in research projects, ERCIM not only advances scientific knowledge but also serves as a bridge between fundamental research and practical applications. As a trusted voice in the international ICT community, ERCIM actively represents European research interests on the global stage.

In close cooperation with partners worldwide, including non-EU institutions and international organisations, ERCIM strengthens global research connections. The organisation also promote technology transfer, supports innovation, and nurtures the next generation of researchers through training and its fellowship programmes <https:// fellowship.ercim.eu>.

By creating synergies across its diverse activities, ERCIM delivers meaningful impact for its members, contributes to national research strategies, and drives European excellence in ICT.

For a general presentation of ERCIM, see the ERCIM presentation slides

Programme for PhD Education

Details
Last Updated: 06 September 2016

The ERCIM Programme for PhD Education (EPPE) is a new mobility programme for cooperation in PhD education among ERCIM members. The goal is to add a European international dimension to PhD education by crossing national, scientific and institutional borders.

With experience from the successful ERCIM postdoctoral Fellowship Programme, the EPPE reduces administrative and formal obstacles for PhD students, supervisors and institutions when establishing cooperation.

Objectives

  • Improve the quality of PhD education.
  • Exploit complementary qualities of institutes and universities.
  • Facilitate research cooperation among institutions and candidates.
  • Disseminate research results from EU funded research.
  • Make ERCIM institutions more attractive in recruiting good candidates.

Principles

1. The EPPE provides added value to programmes already run by ERCIM members. Participation is on voluntary basis.  .

2. The EPPE is limited to the duration of the actual presence at the two cooperating ERCIM institutions during the PhD studies.  The cooperation can result in a:

  • Single Degree:  A national degree is delivered by one ERCIM institution (Home). Research visits are of 3 months minimum in another ERCIM institution (Host).
  • Double Degree: Two national diplomas are issued by two institutions of higher education and recognized officially in the countries where the degree-awarding institutions are located. Research visits are of 12 months minimum at each institution.

The Double Degree requires additional formalities, in particular regarding the the content of the curriculum and research thesis, and on the evaluation procedures. National and institutional laws and regulations must be respected. In both cases, PhD candidates will have formally assigned supervisors at both institutions.

3. Candidates have a Home Institution and a Host Institution.

  • The Home Institution is responsible for the student. This is usually the institution where the student is affiliated, which funds the candidate and appoints the principal supervisor.
  • The student spends a limited time at the Host Institution.

4. The EPPE provides templates for cooperation agreements dealing with scientific supervision, costs, IPR, evaluation for double degrees, and other matters.

5. The programme is efficiently operated and simple to use. It provides a safe and legal platform. The rules, documents and information system permits supervisors students to easily establish a safe cooperation.

6. Through the ERCIM platform, members can raise awareness of their PhD programs and call for candidates.

How it works in practice

A set of contract templates and guidelines is available for members on request (see contact). Based on the experiences from several member institutions, the package is composed of three main documents:

  • Framework Agreement   between ERCIM, Home and Host Institutions on participation in EPPE
  • Individual Agreement involving the Host and Home institutions for a joint supervision at doctoral degree level of a doctoral candidate
  • Glossary

Please contact:: Emma Lière (This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.)

More Articles …

  1. Expert Groups
  2. Past Events
  3. Upcoming ERCIM Events
  4. Working Groups

Subcategories

Ethics WG Article Count: 9

2022 Article Count: 2

2023 Article Count: 3

2024 Article Count: 2

Italy CNR The Netherlands CWI Germany Fraunhofer Luxembourg FNR Greece FORTH Portugal INESC France INRIA Greece ISI Spain ITIS-UMA Norway NTNU Sweden RISE Austria SBA  Hungary SZTAKI Cyprus UCY Poland UWAW
© ERCIM | legal information

ERCIM is the European Partner of W3C